🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."